富水软岩页岩隧道施工力学三维数值分析
摘要
约 190m、开挖高度约 15.5m和水头约 78m的条件下,围岩级别为Ⅴ级且岩体强度较低,本研究旨在对该隧道富水
软岩页岩段进行三维数值分析。首先基于实地勘察资料和隧道设计参数,构建三维有限元模型,采用 COMSOL
Multiphysics软件进行模拟;其次定义模型参数,包括岩石的弹性模量、泊松比、抗压强度等,并设置相应的边界条
件;第三设置不同的注浆加固方案,包括不同注浆压力和材料类型,通过逐步施加开挖荷载,观察围岩的应力和位
移反应。在高压注浆方案下,围岩的最大主应力进一步降低至 3.5 MPa,最大位移降至 15 mm,这一方案显示出最佳
的加固效果,围岩的应力和位移均达到了最优状态。
关键词
全文:
PDF参考
[1]Liu L, Song Z, Li X. Artificial intelligence in tunnel
construction: A comprehensive review of hotspots and
frontier topics[J]. Geohazard Mechanics, 2024, 2(1): 1-12.
[2]Xu Z, Lin P, Xing H, et al. Hydro-mechanical
coupling response behaviors in tunnel subjected to a waterfilled karst cave[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,
2021, 54(8): 3737-3756.
[3]Zhang D, Sun Z, Fang Q. Scientific problems
and research proposals for Sichuan–Tibet railway tunnel
construction[J]. Underground Space, 2022, 7(3): 419-439.
[4]Yan T, Shen S L, Zhou A. Identification of geological
characteristics from construction parameters during shield
tunnelling[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2023, 18(1): 535-551.
[5]崔凌岳,王福文,孙铁成.浅埋暗挖交叉相贯
隧道施工力学行为试验研究 [J].建筑科学与工程学报,
2024,41(2):115-123
[6]吴康,申玉生,易鹏豪,宗志栓,邱泽刚,陈
晨.软土地层浅埋暗挖矩形大断面隧道施工力学响应特征
[J].城市轨道交通研究,2024,27(10):45-50
[7]Mishra A K, Aithal P S. Job safety analysis during
tunnel construction[J]. International Journal of Applied
Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 2021, 5(1):
80-96.
[8]Song Z, Cheng Y, Zhang Z, et al. Tunnelling
performance prediction of cantilever boring machine in
sedimentary hard-rock tunnel using deep belief network[J].
Journal of Mountain Science, 2023, 20(7): 2029-2040.
[9]Lei M, Shi Y, Tang Q, et al. Construction control
technology of a four-hole shield tunnel passing through pile
foundations of an existing bridge: a case study[J]. Journal of
Central South University, 2023, 30(7): 2360-2373.
[10 ]Qiao Y, Tang J, Liu G, et al. Longitudinal
mechanical response of tunnels under active normal faulting[J].
Underground Space, 2022, 7(4): 662-679.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12361/2661-3506-06-12-140226
Refbacks
- 当前没有refback。