翻转课堂联合情景模拟对眼科实习生临床胜任力的影响
摘要
与传统带教,评价出科Mini-CEX总分、分域、3项考核、满意度及推广意愿。结果:试验组Mini-CEX总分高于对
照(52.33±3.78 vs 48.50±3.51),3项考核差5.54、4.21、5.42(BH-P<0.01),满意度差6.88。结论:联合教学组总分、
考核、满意度及推广意愿均优,敏感性一致,安全性好。
关键词
全文:
PDF参考
[1]Spencer SKR, Ireland PA, Braden J, et al. A
Systematic Review of Ophthalmology Education in Medical
Schools: The Global Decline[J]. Ophthalmology,2024,
131(7):855-863.
[2]Chan PP, Lee VWY, Yam JCS, et al. Flipped
Classroom Case Learning vs Traditional Lecture-Based
Learning in Medical School Ophthalmology Education: A
Randomized Trial[J]. Acad Med,2023,98(9):1053-1061.
[3]Spaic D, Bukumiric Z, Rajovic N, et al. The Flipped
Classroom in Medical Education: Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis[J]. J Med Internet Res,2025,27:e60757.
[4]Khalid H, Chaudhary N, Asif N, et al. Mini-CEX as
a formative assessment tool for undergraduate medical students
in ophthalmology[J]. J Pak Med Assoc,2024,74(12):
2160-2163.
[5]Durrani SF, Hameed A, Rani P, et al. Effect of
Mini-CEX as formative learning tool for clinical skills in
undergraduate medical students in a private medical university
in Karachi, Pakistan[J]. BMC Med Educ,2025,25(1):
1356.
Refbacks
- 当前没有refback。
