非肌层浸润性膀胱癌的手术治疗研究进展

张 明杰1, 任 海林2
1、青海大学研究生院
2、青海大学附属医院泌尿外科

摘要


非肌层浸润性膀胱癌NMIBC是膀胱癌中最常见的类型之一其高复发率和治疗后的预后问题一直是
临床医生所关注的重点。传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术TURBT是NMIBC的标准治疗方式但其在手术过程中可
能导致肿瘤碎片化及术后高复发率等遗留问题。为解决这一问题光动力诊断辅助TURBTPDD-TURBT和整
块切除术ERBT逐渐成为研究热点。PDD-TURBT通过增强对微小病变和原位癌CIS的识别提高了肿瘤
切除率减少了术后复发。而ERBT作为一种整块切除肿瘤的新技术避免了传统TURBT带来的肿瘤播散和碎片
化问题在改善术后病理评估和减少复发方面展现出巨大潜力。尽管PDD-TURBT和ERBT在成本和操作复杂性
上仍面临挑战但其在临床应用中的前景广阔有望为NMIBC的治疗提供更优选择。本综述将对TURBTPDDTURBT及ERBT的两种新近治疗方法展开阐述以期为NMIBC的治疗提供参考价值。

关键词


非肌层浸润性膀胱癌;经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术;光动力诊断;经尿道膀胱肿瘤整块切除术;整块切除术

全文:

PDF


参考


[1]Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics[J],

2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49.

[2]Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Soerjomataram I,

et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates

of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263.

[3]于昕冉,冯兵.基于CT影像组学预测非肌层浸

润性膀胱癌术后复发的临床价值[J].临床放射学杂志,

2024,43(05):788-793.

[4]Fujii Y. Prediction models for progression of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: A review[J]. Int J Urol. 2018

Mar;25(3):212-218.

[5]Bree KK, Shan Y, Hensley PJ, et al. Management,

Surveillance Patterns, and Costs Associated With Low-Grade

Papillary Stage Ta Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Among Older Adults, 2004-2013[J]. JAMA Netw Open.

2022;5(3):e223050.

[6]康海明,闫鹏宇,杨晓峰.光动力技术介导膀胱

癌精准诊疗的研究进展[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2024,29

(08):744-749.

[7]Kramer MW, Altieri V, Hurle R, et al. Current

Evidence of Transurethral En-bloc Resection of Nonmuscle

Invasive Bladder Cancer[J]. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3(6):567-576.

[8]Mori K, D’Andrea D, Enikeev DV, et al. En bloc

resection for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: review of the

recent literature[J]. Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(1):41-47.

[9]Maheshwari PN, Arora AM, Sane MS, et al. Safety,

feasibility, and quality of holmium laser en-bloc resection

of nonmuscle invasive bladder tumors - A single-center

experience[J]. Indian J Urol. 2020;36(2):106-111.

[10]Kausch I, Sommerauer M, Montorsi F, et al.

Photodynamic diagnosis in non-muscle-invasive bladder

cancer: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of

prospective studies[J]. Eur Urol. 2010;57(4):595-606.

[11]Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, et al. European

Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive

Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ)[J]. Eur Urol.

2022;81(1):75-94.

[12]Li M, Toniolo J, Nandurkar R, et al. Continuous

bladder irrigation after transurethral resection of non-muscle

invasive bladder cancer for prevention of tumour recurrence:

a systematic review[J]. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91(12):2592-2598.

[13]Ozer K, Horsanali MO, Gorgel SN, et al. Bladder

injury secondary to obturator reflex is more common

with plasmakinetic transurethral resection than monopolar

transurethral resection of bladder cancer[J]. Cent European J

Urol. 2015;68(3):284-288.

[14]McNicholas K, MacGregor MN, Gleadle JM. In

order for the light to shine so brightly, the darkness must be

present-why do cancers fluoresce with 5-aminolaevulinic

acid?[J]. Br J Cancer. 2019;121(8):631-639.

[15]顾佳毅,薄隽杰.表浅性膀胱癌的光动力诊断[J].

中国激光医学杂志,2009,18(05):321-326.

[16]Nakamura Y, Ishikawa Y, Kobayashi M, et al.

Location-specific diagnostic efficiency of photodynamic

diagnosis-guided biopsy in bladder mapping biopsies. Int J

Urol. Published online August 2, 2024.

[17]Fukuhara H, Yamamoto S, Lai HW, et al.

Real-world experience with 5-aminolevulinic acid

for photodynamic diagnosis of bladder cancer (2nd

report): Reduced bladder recurrence after PDDTURBT[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022;38:102757.

[18]Matsushita Y, Miyake M, Nishimura N, et

al. Comparative assessment of disease recurrence after

transurethral resection of non-muscle-invasive bladder

cancer with and without a photodynamic diagnosis using

5-aminolevulinic acid: a propensity score-matching

analysis[J]. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024;29(2):205-212.

[19]Miyake M, Nishimura N, Nakahama T, et al.

Differences in oncological benefits from second transurethral

resection between white-light initial surgery and

photodynamic diagnosis-guided initial surgery for primary

high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer[J]. Int J Urol.

2024;31(8):876-885.

[20]Okabe Y, Fukuhara Y, Matsuoka W, et

al. Identification of risk factors associated with oral

5-aminolevulinic acid induced adverse events in

photodynamic diagnosis-transurethral resection of bladder

tumor[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2024;49:104291.

[21]Fukuhara H, Hagiwara Y, Oba K, et al. Realworld experience with 5-aminolevulinic acid for

photodynamic diagnosis of bladder cancer (3rd report):

Cost impact of transurethral resection of bladder tumor in

Japan[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2023;44:103758.

[22]Cumberbatch MGK, Foerster B, Catto JWF,

et al. Repeat Transurethral Resection in Non-muscleinvasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review[J]. Eur Urol.2018;73(6):925-933.

[23]Herrmann TRW. En bloc resection of bladder

tumors (ERBT) revisited 12 years after reintroduction:

too good to be further ignored[J]. World J Urol.

2023;41(10):2577-2582.

[24]Diana P, Gallioli A, Fontana M, et al. Energy

source comparison in en-bloc resection of bladder tumors:

subanalysis of a single-center prospective randomized

study[J]. World J Urol. 2023;41(10):2591-2597.

[25]Yao Q, Niu H, Yang X, et al. A novel laser

resection approach: efficacy of rotatable bi-channel en bloc

resection of bladder tumor in a pilot in-vivo study[J]. Lasers

Med Sci. 2024;39(1):188.

[26]Enikeev D, Morozov A, Shpikina A, et al. A 10-

year renaissance of en bloc resection of bladder tumors

(ERBT): Are we approaching the peak or is it back to the

trough?[J]. World J Urol. 2023;41(10):2607-2615.

[27]D’Andrea D, Soria F, Hurle R, et al. En Bloc

Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor

(eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label,

Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Oncol.

2023;6(5):508-515.

[28]Wang, Chi-Wei et al. “Comparison of Pathological

Outcome and Recurrence Rate between En Bloc

Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor and Conventional

Transurethral Resection: A Meta-Analysis[J].”Cancers vol.

15,7 2055. 30 Mar. 2023, doi:10.3390/cancers15072055.

[29]Yanagisawa T, Matsukawa A, Iwatani K, et al.

En Bloc Resection Versus Conventional TURBT for

T1HG Bladder Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched

Analysis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(6):3820-3828.

[30]Yanagisawa T, Mori K, Motlagh RS, et al. En

Bloc Resection for Bladder Tumors: An Updated Systematic

Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Differential Effect on Safety,

Recurrence and Histopathology[J]. J Urol. 2022;207(4):754-

768.

[31]Miyake M, Nishimura N, Fujii T, et al.

Photodynamic Diagnosis-Assisted En Bloc Transurethral

Resection of Bladder Tumor for Nonmuscle Invasive

Bladder Cancer: Short-Term Oncologic and Functional

Outcomes[J]. J Endourol. 2021;35(3):319-327.

[32]Kannan D, Sekaran PG, Sankaran S, et al. The

Impact of En-bloc Transurethral Resection of Bladder

Tumour on Clinical, Pathological and Oncological Outcomes:

A Cohort Study[J]. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42523.

[33]Yuen-Chun Teoh J, Cheng CH, Tsang CF, et al.

Transurethral En Bloc Resection Versus Standard Resection

of Bladder Tumour: A Randomised, Multicentre, Phase 3

Trial[J]. Eur Urol. 2024;86(2):103-111.

[34]Petov V, Timofeeva E, Sukhanov R, et al.

Prospective non-randomized comparison of transurethral laser

en bloc resection vs. conventional resection of bladder tumors

larger than 3 cm[J]. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024;76(4):436-

441.


Refbacks

  • 当前没有refback。